Menu Report a problem

News

News, Facebook and Twitter updates

Motorcycles, Potholes and Bad Weather Tips for Safer Riding.

137b71a30261a114363946b95dc2b1602644660b

The good weather has made an appearence so time to dust down the leathers, check the oil, battery and tyre presures and mount up. Whether a casual rider who squeezes in saddle time where they can or a biker using their motorcycle to commute, all should expect bad weather to blow into any road trip at some point among those miles.

It’s a biker-truth, between the trips that take a rider far from home and Mother Nature’s strange sense of humor, the odds are every biker will face increment weather of some sort. As with any facet of riding, having the knowledge and confidence to manage unexpected or sudden events is half the secret to cruising through with relative ease.

This is one in a series of articles taking riders through the skillsets needed to ride through a variety of severe weather situations. It also explains what is going on around the rider and their motorcycle in each case as we all know it’s easier to manage a situation if with an understanding of what’s actually happening.

This article focuses on riding through rain and while it may seem easily done, we would ask everyone to read on.

First, a few basic tips.

Always check the weather. Right up to pulling out of the driveway, riders should check the weather along the route, regardless of how formally planned it is. Even if no specific route is planned, knowing where any possible unwanted weather is expected allows bikers to ride around those areas.

Beware of pudles which may contain a hidden danger such as a deep pothole. This can have serious consequesnces to anybody who hits one at speed. Bikers can report potholes in real time to warn their fellow riders of these dangers by using streetrepairs.co.uk 

Taking a quick glance at a weather map while fueling up or during a stop is always a good habit to have as well.

It should be common biker-sense riders are prepared by carrying some type of rain gear strapped or stored on the motorcycle. As readers will see, half the battle to riding through most types of increment weather is staying warm and dry. While this is fairly common advice, often overlooked is the additional thought of taking spare shirts, whether long sleeved apparel or just another t-shirt.

Aside from changing into something dry, the high wind experienced at the most moderate riding speeds can quickly stretch out that favorite biker t-shirt. The only thing worse than riding through a storm is finding that favorite rally commemorative tee is ruined when finally arriving home.

Wrapping up the basic tips, the final solution to managing any adverse weather is to simply stop. A biker can enjoy the upper-hand over Mother Nature by finding a safe location, put the kickstand down and wait it out. Even if the area doesn’t offer protection from the elements, standing in the rain away from a hazardous and possibly deadly road is a much better choice than trying to ‘push-through’.

When riding in the rain what’s going on? Most obvious answer is the motorcycle and its rider are getting drenched, but a closer look exposes a variety of conspiracies to make life tough on the biker.

The first of which is a drop in body temperature. The molecules in water are closer together than those found in air, allowing any rain on a biker’s skin or clothes to quickly transfer the heat from the body to the cooler wind whistling by. Whether from exposed skin or wet clothing, the body’s heat will essentially bleed off much quicker than it would without everything being wet. The cooler the air temperature and quicker the wind, the more noticeable the drop in the body’s core temperature will be felt.

Although it may feel like it, the rain isn’t only falling on the rider and motorcycle but also on the road. Even if draining off as it lands, the more rain on a road’s surface increases an opportunity for aquaplaning or hydroplaning. This term is used to describe when water builds between the wheels of the bike and the road surface. It leads to the loss of control and in extreme situations, turns the motorcycle into a sled. Hydroplaning is dangerous in four-wheeled vehicles and downright scary on a motorcycle with only two.

Even with light rain, visibility is reduced. The heaver the storm, the more visibility is limited. Not only does limited visibility make it harder for the biker to see where they’re riding, it also makes it difficult for other road users to see the biker. Study after study shows drivers simply don’t see or overlook motorcyclists in the best of conditions, imagine what happens in a downpour?

Now we’ve clarified what is happening to and around a biker caught in the rain, how is the situation best managed?

Obviously if available, riders should change into rain gear sooner than later allowing them to stay dry, retain body heat and more importantly, focus to manage the situation. Any rider who’s been caught in a storm knows of the elation when it’s initially left behind only to face uncomfortable, damp miles as they wait for the wet clothes to dry off!

What it feels like to ride through the rain, no matter how light, will depend on what is being ridden and worn. From the riding position itself to whether the motorcycle enjoys any type of windscreen or fairings will impact on the ease or discomfort faced. This extends to not only what helmet is being worn, but to boots gloves and apparel as well.

The most immediate need when facing this riding condition is keeping distractions to a minimum and the vision clear. Raindrops hitting the face at even lower speeds can feel like needles with those wearing full face helmets avoiding this particular discomfort. Bikers without full-faced helmets should consider bandannas or anything to cover their face to help with this distraction.

In one way however, motorcyclists have a much better view of the road than other vehicle operators, unencumbered by roofs and the ‘cages’ housing cars and truck drivers. Having said that, overall visibility will be reduced so bikers should ride at a speed which gives room to stop in the distance seen. Along with the extra space allowed for reaction time in the less than favorable conditions, control of the motorcycle should be smooth.

Without gripping too tightly, the motorcycle should be eased to where it needs to be with brakes and the throttle operated gently. Acceleration and braking should be done outside of turning to maintain control of the motorcycle and avoid the previously mentioned aquaplaning. This requires riders to plan ahead of any maneuvers to determine when to accelerate or brake. Using engine braking, or downshifting, for corners and junctions will reduce the risk of skidding.

Maintaining slower speeds and extra space will help avoid road hazards as well as potholes and puddles. The last two are filled with water leaving riders unable to judge their true depth with deadly consequences if determined incorrectly.

Everyday surfaces can become deadly with a layer of water. It’s well known the first rain after a long dry period brings up and floats all the engine oil collected on the road. Add ot this, the following can become slick with rain; White and yellow lines painted on the highway, slick concrete surfaces, manhole covers, railroad tracks and the sheets of heavy metal used to patch highway construction.

Many may have read this article with the mental image of day time, albeit overcast and dark for the given examples. Unfortunately, storms happen at night as well and only multiplies all the issues and concerns outlined so far. If this is the case, pulling over and waiting out the storm is even more important and if on a long road trip, consider getting a hotel room for the night.

This last consideration should be applied if any of the challenges faced while riding in the rain become too much. Lower body temperature, cold hands, minimal visibility and the first sight of lightning are all signs a rider should pull over and wait it out. Better to arrive at your destination late than not at all.

Very Dangerous Potholes "not that bad" Say's Council

951285fd4250c163610d7142bd13ae3f19e7520c

Cumberland Street . Macclesfield . Cyclist David Mayers says he risks his life commuting to work along Cumberland Street due to the numerous giant pot holes.

A cyclist who regularly has to swerve to avoid potholes on a major road is furious after being told they were ‘not considered a danger to highway users’.

David Mayers rides along Cumberland Street in Macclesfield to his job as a maths lecturer at Macclesfield College.

Sick of veering into the path of motorists to avoid deep and uneven crevices in the road, David used the ‘report a pothole’ facility on Cheshire East Council’s website.

But to David’s astonishment, in a reply sent two weeks later, the council said it had inspected the area and found ‘no defects identified that were considered to present a danger to highway users’.

David said: “The council’s response was unbelievable. I was furious, as I regularly have to put my safety at risk, as well as that of other road users, by swerving round the damaged sections of road.

“This is a complete dereliction of duty on behalf of the council.

“We all know the roads in Macclesfield are getting worse all the time, and now we know why.

“Most people don’t bother to report potholes because of exactly this sort of whitewash.

“These potholes present a massive risk to cyclists; and because of the heavy traffic they are getting rapidly worse.

“There are plenty of other people who cycle out of necessity on Cumberland Street; I am sure there would be many more if Cheshire East Council looked after the roads properly.”

The criticism comes only weeks after the council announced the Tour of Britain cycling race is to take place on local roads including the Cat and Fiddle A537 before ending at Tatton Park.

A spokesman for the council said: “An inspection was carried out on February 27, following an enquiry from a local resident.

“Some deterioration of the road surface was evident, but the scale and nature of the defect does not meet the intervention level for repair.

“Cheshire East Highways operates a robust safety inspection regime and all adopted highways are inspected in accordance with standards that meet national best practice.

“The council has made significant investment in the borough’s highways network, resulting in a substantial reduction in the number of potholes.”

 

Pothole Outrage As Council Dodges Rules

24140a5d6fadcb338c1dae0636a13caa7108741c

Highways bosses have changed their definition of a pothole in an attempt to save thousands of pounds.

Previously a repair team would be sent out if a fault in the road had a depth of at least 40mm, or 1.5 inches.

But now, to the outrage of motorists, motorcyclists and cyclists, the dangerous dents will not be fixed unless they are 50% deeper at 60mm – 2.36 inches – or more.

Potholes have been popping up at an increased rate due to wet winter weather.

Perth and Kinross Council in Scotland admitted last month that its roads had been badly affected.

Yet it has still decided to go ahead with the new ­criteria which it expects to save £120,000 a year.

Councillor Willie Robertson, a keen cyclist, said: “As a cyclist I know that damaged road drains are a real danger. Often you can’t avoid them.

"I am also aware of a few people locally who have damaged their cars on potholes recently.

"I wonder what the cost will ultimately be when people claim for compensation for the cost of repairing their vehicles?”

Criteria for pothole repair

40mm

Previous depth

60mm

New depth

The RAC’s Rod Dennis who uses the "Street Repairs" system for reporting potholes described it as a “false economy” and added: “The larger a pothole becomes, the greater risk it ­represents to road users and the more costly it becomes to repair.

"While in the short term the council might save money by repairing only larger potholes, it is saving up an expensive problem further down the line.”

The council has paid out more than £80,000 in pothole damage compensation in five years.

A spokesman said: “To ensure safety, we’ll continue to ­undertake repairs in inherently dangerous circumstances.”

Cyclist Ralph Brazier, 52, died last week after apparently hitting a pothole and falling off his bike in Weybridge, Surrey.

Definitions of a pothole vary across the UK. In Bath it is just 30mm but in Hounslow, West London, the definition is 75mm.

Residents on a street in Croft-on-Tees, North Yorks, are furious after the council ­threatened to stop rubbish collections because their pothole-riddled road is considered dangerous for bin lorries.

The villagers have also been told to foot the repair bill because ownership of the road is in dispute.

Richmondshire District Council has said it is too dangerous for bin lorries to use.

And it has told home owners to foot the repair bill themselves.

Julie Toombes, the council’s waste and street scene supervisor, wrote the letter to the 18 property owners affected.

It said: “It has been brought to my attention that the condition of the access road to your property has deteriorated and by continuing to use the access road in this condition, it could potentially cause damage to our collection vehicles.

“I am therefore writing to request that you make arrangements to carry out repairs to the road.

“Collection arrangements will continue from your current collection point until Tuesday, March 15, however if after this date you have been unable to repair the road it will be necessary to implement a temporary collection point for the collection of your refuse and recycling.”

Cyclist and Father Killed by Pothole.

286deb7ac04388d4a82cb6b715972293b9c74042

A FATHER of three died when his bicycle hit a four-inch deep pothole that a council had been repeatedly warned about.

Software firm accountant Ralph Brazier, 52, was thrown on to the road while out riding with his cycling club.

The hole, 6in wide and 3ft long and next to a storm drain, had been sprayed red ahead of being repaired. It was fixed the following day. 

Paramedics treated Mr Brazier, a superfit charity fundraiser, at the scene on Tuesday in Weybridge, Surrey, but he died in hospital after a cardiac arrest.

Last night wife Karen, 53, and their three teenage sons were being comforted at home in Thames Ditton.

Ten days earlier Ralph had been riding in Majorca with pals.

One, 46-year-old David Marsden, said: “He was strong, safe and competent. He was an inspiration to the younger guys.”

Another, Brett Scillitoe, added: “This could have been any one of us. I will not let this rest.”

Complaints about the pothole date back to 2009. It was last fixed little more than a year ago.

Harry Turner, 81, who lives opposite, said: “They did a temporary job — but, if you don’t do it properly, holes appear again.”

Surrey council said it was awaiting a report. It has paid £376,000 in compensation over 1,302 pothole incidents since 2013.

 

 

 

 

Source and pic The Sun.

Freedom of Information Victory

C4df155365c2397dee9c350fbf1df568e32cec62

Why have possible restrictions on FOI been blocked?

When it was appointed, the government's Freedom of Information Commission was derided by some as an "establishment stitch-up" that would inevitably lead to tough curbs on the public's right to know what its rulers are doing.

Street Repairs has offered FOI to its thousands of users for many years click here 

In fact the Commission's report has surprised many, being more sympathetic to greater openness than expected, while also backing some changes that would help public authorities to keep some material secret.

And at least one proposal it did make to restrict FOI - bolstering the legal basis for ministers' rights to veto disclosure - has already been rejected by the government.

This has left openness campaigners with some powerful feelings of relief. So, despite the fact that David Cameron thinks FOI "furs up" the process of government, and the Cabinet Secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood objects to its "chilling effects", why have those who want to restrain FOI been disappointed?

There is the zeitgeist of our time, which lauds openness - exemplified in ministerial rhetoric about "being the most transparent government in the world".

There is also the strong pressure applied by FOI supporters - notably the dedicated and tightly argued lobbying by the Campaign for Freedom of Information, the numbers mobilised through the website 38 Degrees, and the powerful publicity of the media, such as the Daily Mail.

And there is the fact that the government would probably find it difficult to get restrictive change through Parliament. Its small majority in the Commons could easily be overturned as some Tory MPs like David Davis have already made it clear they would oppose constraints on FOI. In the Lords the government has no majority at all.


Is there another possibility?

Yes, that in its lengthy and detailed report the Commission shows it was swayed by the evidence about how FOI actually works in practice.

It is not yet clear how the government will respond to all the Commission's recommendations. The Cabinet Office minister Matt Hancock says: "We will not make any legal changes to FOI", so that would appear to rule out any legislation.

This would mean that many of the Commission's ideas - both some promoting secrecy and others promoting openness - would not be implemented. Any change would then be limited to government guidance.

In which case the Freedom of Information Act would be left, as the Commission puts it, pretty much in its current state of "working well".


Why was the Freedom of Information Commission set up?

The Freedom of Information Act has not been popular at the heart of government.

The act gives the public the right to obtain much of the information held by public authorities and is regarded by many in positions of power as somewhere on a scale from pointless nuisance to deeply infuriating and much worse.

This is true both of politicians and officials.

Last year Prime Minister David Cameron described FOI as being one of the"clutteration" and "buggeration" factors that impeded the process of governing.

In 2012, he told a committee of MPs it was an "endless discovery process that furs up the whole of government" - although he quickly added: "Don't worry, we are not making any proposals to change it."

The Cabinet Secretary, Sir Jeremy Heywood, in a rare public appearance, told a seminar last year FOI, while "positive" overall, had led to extra costs and "chilling effects" - the term used to argue officials were now less likely to provide frank opinions and record honest discussion.

Against this background, the trigger was a judgement from the Supreme Court last March in the dispute involving the Prince of Wales' correspondence with ministers, where he had advocated particular causes.

The court backed the Guardian's case these letters should be released.e of Prince Charles's letters referred exp  In doing so, the court made it much harder for the government to use the "ministerial veto", the "backstop provision" that allows it to overrule instructions from the Information Commissioner or the Information Rights Tribunal that material should be disclosed.


What was the commission's remit?

The commission's core aim was to review whether "sensitive information" and policy material needed greater protection from disclosure.

It was also authorised to examine whether FOI places an excessive "burden" on public authorities.

Some local councils have complained about the cost of dealing with FOI requests, particularly trivial ones and those that come from the media or businesses.

The public protests from local government about FOI have tended to focus on this issue of the "administrative burden", in contrast to concerns expressed at central government level, which are not about cost but mainly about protecting policy discussion.

The commission's role relates to the UK-wide act, which covers England, Wales, Northern Ireland and UK-wide public bodies.

There is a separate, although similar, Freedom of Information Act for Scotland.


Why was the commission's creation controversial?

Freedom of information campaigners argued at first that the review was too narrowly focused, only on restrictions to FOI, when it should also have been asked to consider ways the act could be extended.ormer Home Secretary Jack Straw (seen here at the state opening of Parliament) was appointed to the commission

The membership of the commission was also strongly criticised for being limited to people with a one-sided experience of FOI - that of being on the receiving end of requests rather than making them.

Former Treasury permanent secretary Lord Burns chairs the commission.

Other members included Ofcom head Dame Patricia Hodgson and two former Home Secretaries, Lord Howard and Jack Straw.


How has the commission operated?

The original announcement said the commission, created in July 2015, would report by November.

In the wake of the fuss over its composition, it then decided to issue a consultation document and take evidence, and it fell badly behind its initial timetable.

In October last year, the commission was widely ridiculed after it gave a briefing to a select invited group of journalists, which it insisted was off-the-record, while the unidentifiable anonymous source there stated: "Our aim is to be as open as possible."

Since then, the commission has changed its approach, posting on its websiteminutes of its meetings, research papers it has commissioned and some of the evidence it has received.

 

 

 

source bbc.

 
 
Tweets by @StreetRepairs
 
 
 
text/javascript