Menu Report a problem

News

News, Facebook and Twitter updates

Flooding prevention disaster in the UK

Db2b7a6183131ff97bc8ab7d72d40d114a73f441
The UK needs to spend an extra £500m on flood prevention, experts said

The Committee on Climate Change told BBC News that just as scientists are predicting more extreme weather, buildings are still being allowed on flood plains, gardens are still being paved over and urban green space is being lost.The government has been criticised by its own advisers for failing to prevent developments that contribute to flooding.

The committee said an extra £500m was needed to stop flooding getting even worse.

The government said a record amount was already being spent on flood defences.

Members of the committee, the government's official advisory body, have been exasperated by the row over dredging in the Somerset Levels.

'Wrong direction'

They say the floods debate is far too narrow, and insist the whole water system in the UK needs to be re-engineered to catch water on the uplands and prevent flooding downstream.

The committee's specialist on adapting to climate change, Daniel Johns, said: "Flood damages are expected to increase across the UK. Scientists are becoming bolder in attributing recent weather events and flooding to the level of global warming already observed.

"But measures of our exposure to flooding are going in the wrong direction.

"Development appears to be continuing in areas of significant flood risk despite planning controls. Urban green space is being lost and gardens are being paved over. Permeable paving options are available but their take-up appears very low.

"Every millimetre of rain deposits a litre of water on a square metre of land. A day of even modest rainfall can deposit several million litres of water on a town or city."

If the £500m needed for flood risk management was not spent, increasing numbers of homes would be at "significant flood risk", Mr Johns said.He called for the widespread adoption of so-called Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS), which capture water and slow the rate that it enters the drains.

"As a result, we can expect avoidable flooding to take place in future years, causing as much as perhaps £3bn in damages," he said.

He said the £500m was needed over a four-year period.

Think differently

His comments were backed by Andrew Miller, chair of the Commons Science and Technology Committee.

Mr Miller said the government should reforest hillsides where soil had been compacted by sheep, and use "soft engineering" to capture rainfall in upstream areas.

"We have got to think differently about the way we do things," he told BBC News.

"Clearly it makes sense for us to do engineering work upstream if we can slow down the flow of water much more cheaply and effectively than by taking measures downstream. These issues are even more important given the prospect of climate change."

Pumps spray water into a river

Mr Miller said it was time to re-focus the debate on flooding towards prevention rather than cure.

What is believed to be the UK's biggest preventive scheme is underway in Llanelli.

Welsh Water, a not-for-profit company, introduced it because the town's sewerage system repeatedly flooded homes and polluted the River Lliedi.

It involves digging up stretches of tarmac and paving to create catchment pits for storm water, diverting water into the pits from gutters and finally putting grass and plants on top of the pits.

Other ways

The water is held in the soil and slowly seeps away or evaporates. The ideas have been praised by the water regulator Ofwat.

Steve Wilson, a director of Welsh Water, told BBC News: "Llanelli suffers quite a lot of flooding. Traditionally we would build bigger pipes or tanks to catch the water but we're reaching the capacity of them too soon.

"So we are trying an approach that will be cheaper and more effective. We are taking water off the roofs and the streets, then instead of putting it down the highway drains we're finding other ways of putting it back into the environment and being slowed down."

He said some of the early parts of the scheme were catching more water than envisaged. He said the total project would take 22,500 cubic metres of water every year out of sewers, removing the risk of flooding from 57 properties.

Two men stand in a large ditch next to a school playground

Another local innovation is an ingeniously designed playground at the nearby Stebonheath Junior School, which includes a grassy hollow for trapping flood water - known as a swale.

Dylan Davies and Caitlin Thomas, both 11, said pupils had also helped design a rain-catching garden with a pond.

"The playground used to be all flooded. It's much better now," they said.

"When it rains, it runs off the roof and the playground into the swale which absorbs the water and pushes it gently into the drains. It doesn't flood any more."

Two children sitting on rocks next to a pond next to a school playground

Recent changes in planning law oblige all new developments to catch water from their own site and prevent it adding to floods, although the full implementation of the law has been delayed by what critics claim is disarray in government.

Other experimental schemes are attempting to hold water on upland sites by cramming gorse into streams from peat bogs, blocking young rivers with fallen trees and creating low-level earth dams to contain water so it soaks into the soil.

It will be a challenge to devise policies that incentivise farmers to re-forest upland areas to catch water and stop soil running off into streams. Some think farmers should be obliged to change to way they farm in order to obtain their grants from taxpayers.

Tackling the legacy of decades of flood-inducing buildings in towns and cities will be even more costly and challenging. Water engineers hope major supermarkets will demonstrate their claims over social responsibility by breaking up their car parks and installing porous surfaces to catch run-off.

Schemes like this were recommended in the Pitt report into the 2007 floods. They will come under renewed scrutiny as the government studies the lessons to be learned from this year's deluge

Council rarely pays for pothole damage

43210f7008c9081a75a385752a777c9d5f2383fc

Less than 2% of claims made to Buckinghamshire County Council for damage allegedly caused to vehicles by potholes have been paid out.

In 2012/13 the authority paid £4,285 to 13 claimants out of 1,139 claims that were made.

The previous year 434 claims for pothole damage were made, with 15 successful claimants receiving £4,777.

In 2013/14 up to January 21, £1,654 had been paid to two claimants out of 298 made.

Richard Tanner from potholes.co.uk said the amount of successful claimants was ‘surprisingly low’.

The council said all claims are ‘dealt with on an individual basis’.

The figures show a sharp rise in the number of people claiming for pothole damage in 2012/13, with the council saying the bad winter that year could have resulted in more claims.

Gavin Wetherley, manager of ATS in Aylesbury, said they have seen more people bringing cars and tyres in with pothole damage.

He said: “It’s difficult to put a finger on the exact numbers but certainly it has tended to increase.

“There are all sorts of components that can be effected by it.”

People wishing to make a claim have to fill out a seven-page form about the damage, including drawings.

If the council has not been made aware of the pothole before the incident it is unlikely to pay out, with around 80% of claims rejected on this basis.

A council spokesman said: “All claims for damage or injuries relating to potholes are dealt with on an individual basis.

“Every case is different. Each claim is assessed by a team of claims handlers and dealt with as appropriate.

“Factors such as the weather and in particular the severity of the winter can have an impact on the number of potholes, and therefore the number of claims received.”

Mr Tanner said it can be difficult to get compensation.

He said: “A lot of the problem is that people are deterred quite often at the first step when the council writes back and quotes the Highways Act.

“If you’re a little more determined and have good evidence you can be successful.”

Of the Bucks County Council payouts, he said: “That is extremely low considering all those claims.

£330m to be taken back by the DfT after under spend on Highways!

9f3fb1e4b7df3e7406337d47fe87db9ce873166f

In the Department for Transport’s (DfT) 6 month report to Parliament it states: “Capital spending is currently running at less than budgeted levels, and an under spend is expected”.

The majority of this relates to the Highways Agency where expenditure is expected to be £330m less than the Agency’s budget of £3.6bn

Most of this under spend is claimed to be down to achieving greater efficiencies of £135m. The remainder relates to delaying work to future years, which includes £100m for EU projects.

The report also suggests that the money will be invested in other projects which include, £115m for Transport for London and £47m for Cycle City Ambition grants. What’s left will be used to assist in reducing the government’s current deficit.

This will obviously frustrate local highways authorities, who are struggling with the nation’s £10bn pothole road epidemic.

Presumably no plans are set to put this money back into the road network where its needed.

They do state however, that this present government is going to be allocating £50bn in our road network over the next 15 years. We have heard this all before when the backlog of works in 2000 was estimated at £3.6bn which was supposed to be cleared in 10 years. The proof of the pudding as they say.

Source:https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/273729/dft-mid-year-april-sept-2013.pdf

Quality of repairs questioned in Wiltshire

8125d6b68880552eae0d8f999aa5b012e66e4172

Concern about the quality of road repairs, including potholes, carried out by Wiltshire Council has been raised.

At a meeting of Devizes Town Council’s planning committee, Coun Roger Giraud-Saunders said: “There was a pothole at the end of London Road by the Estcourt Rooms and, after being patched, the next day or the day after the repair was already cracked or defective.

“We need to make sure Devizes and Wiltshire is getting value for money.

"Putting a patch in a pothole with high-volume traffic travelling over it and having to repair it a few weeks later doesn’t make much sense to me.”

Coun John Parker said a pothole on the road to Salisbury by Upavon was the size of a “crater” and said the A342 Nursteed Road on the way to Pewsey was partially resurfaced last year and this was already breaking up.

The councillors were pleased to hear that Wiltshire Council is putting extra effort into filling in potholes in the county after the recent heavy rainfall. Wiltshire Council is spending an extra £250,000 to repair potholes.

Town councillors agreed to write to Wiltshire Council expressing their concerns on the quality of repairs carried out and requesting a schedule of work in the pipeline so they can monitor it.

The use of a reporting system such as Street Repairs gives reporters transparency and the option to attach photographs of the fault, making assessment of the works required easier for authorities.

Council refuses to take reports from the public!

We are told time and time again by councils that faults and problems in our area cannot be repaired due to lack of funds. But it seems that one council in particular just refuses to listen.

Street Repairs is a free system that allows the public to easily report faults they notice without the need to know what council is responsible for fixing the issue. One supporter of Street Repairs loved it so much that they contacted South Lanarkshire Council on Twitter to let them know.

https://streetrepairs.co.uk/problems/pothole/464-pothole-fault-reported-strathuclyde-gardens-cambuslang-glasgow-south-lanarkshire-g72-7et-uk

The conversation that followed is more than shocking! Considering that when you access the form they supply a link for, it will not allow you to go any further than the Address detail screen. This has got to be a joke.

Required field? In a box that does not exist? There is nowhere to enter my address South Lanarkshire? Clearly someone is having a good laugh at everyone else’s expense. You can even try it yourself if you want to see it first hand 

http://lvfmaps.southlanarkshire.gov.uk/LocalViewWeb/Sites/GSurvRALFRoads/

Not only is this unacceptable for a government body, it shows their ignorance to their constituents that want to use a service that actually works. Let’s hope that there are no claims against them for reports that they are sent from other means, because they can throw their section 58 defence in the bin.

South Lanarkshire Council, hang your heads in shame.

 
 
Tweets by @StreetRepairs
 
 
 
text/javascript